tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32472356.post5020838721128166303..comments2009-06-01T11:37:29.206-07:00Nikunj Mehtahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08819862609445802833noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32472356.post-85748235699423291582009-06-01T09:28:59.847-07:002009-06-01T09:28:59.847-07:00Agree with Nikunj: atom:feed is the container, if you'd like to contain entries in an entry, then use an inline atom:feed.Hadrienhttp://www.feedbooks.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32472356.post-20705892142593238912009-05-29T06:40:54.038-07:002009-05-29T06:40:54.038-07:00Well, then you are basically advocating the approach I proposed - to use a container element with @rel. Does that sound that different from a link element with nested atom:feed or atom:entry?<br /><br />Summary metadata about the feed such as author, updated and pagination are a few to list as benefits of feed. Ask yourself - why do you use atom:feed instead of some:container?Nikunj Mehtahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08819862609445802833noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32472356.post-50414147873504198112009-05-28T23:45:19.218-07:002009-05-28T23:45:19.218-07:001) There is if you use a container element.<br /><br />2) see 1)<br /><br />3) Could you please elaborate? Which benefits? And how are they lost?Julian Reschkenoreply@blogger.com